SANDAG Joint Policy Advisory CommitteePOST-MEETING AGENDAFriday, September 19, 2025 at 9:00 A.m. - 10:00 A.m.SANDAG Boardroom 1011 Union Street, First FloorSan Diego, CA 92101At SANDAG, we strive to make our meetings, events, and documents accessible to all. SANDAG Board of Directors, Policy Advisory Committee, and working group meetings are open to the public in person and/or virtually in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. Many accommodations are automatically available at our public meetings. Visit SANDAG.org/meetingassistance for more information. For a printed version of the information on that web page, contact [email protected]. Attendees are subject to metal detector screening for weapons prohibited from the meeting per California Penal Code §171b. Review the SANDAG Public Meeting Screening Policy and meeting conduct at SANDAG.org/meetingassistance before attending. SANDAG offices are transit accessible. Public bike racks are available on the west side of the building. Participate virtually via Zoom. Webinar ID: 856 6017 9780Telephone Dial: 1 (669) 444-9171 Public comments can be made in person or virtually or submitted online. Visit SANDAG.org/meetingassistance for instructions. Agendas and Meeting Materials Access agendas and materials from the SANDAG.org/calendar event page for each meeting. Printed agendas are available for review at the SANDAG Customer Service Center, 1129 La Media Road, San Diego, CA 92154. A limited number of printed agenda materials are provided at Board and committee meetings. Language and Accessibility Services Interpretation: Meetings are conducted in English, and simultaneous interpretation is provided in Spanish. Interpretation devices are provided at the meeting. SANDAG will provide simultaneous or consecutive interpretation in another language, including ASL, during public meetings or events upon request. Email [email protected] at least 72 business hours before the meeting or event. Esta reunión se llevará a cabo en inglés, y se ofrecerá interpretación simultánea en español. Free Language Assistance | Ayuda gratuita con el idioma | Libreng Tulong sa Wika | Hỗ trợ ngôn ngữ miễn phí | 免费语言协助 | 免費語言協助 | مساعدة لغوية مجانية | 무료 언어 지원 | کمک زبان رایگان | 無料の言語支援 | Бесплатная языковая помощь | Assistência linguística gratuita | मुफ़्त भाषा सहायता | Assistance linguistique gratuite | ជំនួយភាសាឥតគិតថ្លៃ | ఉచిత భాషా సహాయం | ການຊ່ວຍເຫຼືອດ້ານພາສາຟຣີ | Kaalmada Luqadda ee Bilaashka ah | Безкоштовна мовна допомога | SANDAG.org/languageassistance | 619.699.1900 Closed captioning: Closed captioning is available via Zoom’s Show Captions “CC” icon. Other accommodations: For other ADA accommodations or alternative formats, contact [email protected] or 619.699.1900 at least 72 business hours before the meeting. For TTY services, dial 711. Legal Notices Notice of nondiscrimination: SANDAG complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, ensuring no discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. For complaints or inquiries, contact SANDAG’s compliance officer at 619.699.1900, or file with the Federal Transit Administration or Federal Highway Administration. See Discrimination Complaint Procedures in SANDAG Board Policy No. 009. SANDAG.org/nondiscrimination: SANDAG Notice of Nondiscrimination | Aviso de no discriminación de SANDAG | Abiso sa Hindi Pandidiskrimina ng SANDAG | Thông cáo Không phân biệt đối xử của SANDAG | SANDAG 非歧视通知 | SANDAG: إشعار عدم التمييز 1.Call to Order Public Comments: 2.Non-Agenda Public Comments/Member Comments Public Comments: Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. If the number of public comments under this agenda item exceeds five, additional public comments will be taken at the end of the agenda. Members and SANDAG staff may also present brief updates and announcements under this agenda item.3.2025 Regional Plan Update Attachments | Public Comments1.Staff Report - 2025 Regional Plan Update - TC - 09192025.pdf2.Att.1 - Summary of Proposed 2025 Draft to Final Changes - TC 09192025.pdf3.Presentation - DRAFT Regional Plan Update.pdfRon Medak, MDI am writing in regard to the 2025 Regional Plan Update. I note that SANDAG Staff properly has taken into consideration public concern about the initial plan by SANDAG to support the implementation of “protected bikeways” (Class IV cycle tracks) to the exclusion of other bicycle facilities. Our experience in Encinitas with “protected bikeways” was documented in the paper authored by Steve Linke, Serge Issakov and myself and I am pleased to see that SANDAG staff has recommended the removal of using NACTO guidelines in Appendix K and related documents. Bicycle facilities design and implementation ar best left to local jurisdictions and not to central authorities, be they SANDAG or the State of California. Michael KarresPlease support staff’s idea to remove mentions of the NACTO bikeway guide from Appendix K and other chapters. Right now, the guide makes it seem like every street (except small neighborhood ones) must have “protected bike lanes” (PBLs). But the research on PBLs is unclear, and in many situations, they may actually make biking less safe. There are lots of ways to improve bike safety, and the best choice depends on the situation. Each city or town should be able to decide what works best locally. SANDAG’s role could be to make sure that bike routes connect smoothly and safely across different areas. Peter PenseyresI support staff's proposed removal of references to NACTO bikeway guidance from Appendix K and related chapters. These references appeared to create a requirement that so-called "protected bicycle lanes" (PBLs) be installed on all streets other than local neighborhood streets to the exclusion of other approaches. The research on the safety of PBLs is very inconclusive, and there is strong evidence that they actually decrease bicyclist safety in many contexts. There are many approaches to increase bicyclist safety, which depend on context, and each jurisdiction should be empowered to make local decisions, while SANDAG could perhaps serve the role of helping ensure that transitions between jurisdictions are seamless and safe. I have copied and pasted this comment from an email provided by my friend, Steve Linke. I can't say it any better than he has and I agree completely. Steve LinkeSANDAG Transportation Committee: Please support staff's proposed removal of references to NACTO bikeway guidance from Appendix K and related chapters. These references appeared to create a requirement that so-called "protected bicycle lanes" (PBLs) be installed on all streets other than local neighborhood streets to the exclusion of other approaches. The research on the safety of PBLs is very inconclusive, and there is strong evidence that they actually decrease bicyclist safety in many contexts. There are many approaches to increase bicyclist safety, which depend on context, and each jurisdiction should be empowered to make local decisions, while SANDAG could perhaps serve the role of helping ensure that transitions between jurisdictions are seamless and safe. Steve Linke Former Traffic Commissioner CarlsbadStaff will present an overview of public comments received and proposed changes to the draft 2025 Regional Plan.4.Adjournment Public Comments: The next Transportation Committee meeting is scheduled for Friday, October 17, 2025, at 9 a.m.The next Regional Planning Committee meeting is scheduled for Friday, October 03, 2025, at 1 p.m.The next Borders Committee meeting is scheduled for Friday, September 26, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.No Item Selected Attachments (0) | Public Comments (0)This item has no attachments.1.Staff Report - 2025 Regional Plan Update - TC - 09192025.pdf2.Att.1 - Summary of Proposed 2025 Draft to Final Changes - TC 09192025.pdf3.Presentation - DRAFT Regional Plan Update.pdfThis item has no public commentRon Medak, MD (For)I am writing in regard to the 2025 Regional Plan Update. I note that SANDAG Staff properly has taken into consideration public concern about the initial plan by SANDAG to support the implementation of “protected bikeways” (Class IV cycle tracks) to the exclusion of other bicycle facilities. Our experience in Encinitas with “protected bikeways” was documented in the paper authored by Steve Linke, Serge Issakov and myself and I am pleased to see that SANDAG staff has recommended the removal of using NACTO guidelines in Appendix K and related documents. Bicycle facilities design and implementation ar best left to local jurisdictions and not to central authorities, be they SANDAG or the State of California. Michael Karres (No Position)Please support staff’s idea to remove mentions of the NACTO bikeway guide from Appendix K and other chapters. Right now, the guide makes it seem like every street (except small neighborhood ones) must have “protected bike lanes” (PBLs). But the research on PBLs is unclear, and in many situations, they may actually make biking less safe. There are lots of ways to improve bike safety, and the best choice depends on the situation. Each city or town should be able to decide what works best locally. SANDAG’s role could be to make sure that bike routes connect smoothly and safely across different areas. Peter Penseyres (For)I support staff's proposed removal of references to NACTO bikeway guidance from Appendix K and related chapters. These references appeared to create a requirement that so-called "protected bicycle lanes" (PBLs) be installed on all streets other than local neighborhood streets to the exclusion of other approaches. The research on the safety of PBLs is very inconclusive, and there is strong evidence that they actually decrease bicyclist safety in many contexts. There are many approaches to increase bicyclist safety, which depend on context, and each jurisdiction should be empowered to make local decisions, while SANDAG could perhaps serve the role of helping ensure that transitions between jurisdictions are seamless and safe. I have copied and pasted this comment from an email provided by my friend, Steve Linke. I can't say it any better than he has and I agree completely. Steve Linke (For)SANDAG Transportation Committee: Please support staff's proposed removal of references to NACTO bikeway guidance from Appendix K and related chapters. These references appeared to create a requirement that so-called "protected bicycle lanes" (PBLs) be installed on all streets other than local neighborhood streets to the exclusion of other approaches. The research on the safety of PBLs is very inconclusive, and there is strong evidence that they actually decrease bicyclist safety in many contexts. There are many approaches to increase bicyclist safety, which depend on context, and each jurisdiction should be empowered to make local decisions, while SANDAG could perhaps serve the role of helping ensure that transitions between jurisdictions are seamless and safe. Steve Linke Former Traffic Commissioner Carlsbad